Click here to receive notices when Article 5 News is updated

Article 5 News Header
            Article 5 News Button                        Naysayers button                      State News Button

"Nullification" Works OJ Simpson Was Found Not Guilty Why an Article 5 Convention of States Is a Better Idea Than Nullification
        OJ may have been acquitted because the jurors believed there was not enough evidence to convict him, or maybe because they were righting previous wrongs, personal prejudice or rejection of the police method of investigation. If they believed he was guilty but voted otherwise, for whatever reason, it was jury 'Nullification'.

        Some who are opposed to the Article 5 movement believe Nullification is the better way to fix overreaches of the federal government. They believe that if a state declares a federal law as unconstitutional the state can declare that law null and void within the state borders. It's an old idea first proposed in detail by John Calhoun when he was vice-president under John Quincy Adams. There was even a political party with a couple of representatives elected to Congress from the Nullification Party. When South Carolina declared the Tariff of 1828 was unconstitutional and therefore, null and void in within the boundaries of South Carolina, federal military forces prepared to enforce the tariff. A Compromise Tariff in 1833 prevented the use of force.

        The main basis for Nullification today is the 10th Amendment which says "The powers not delegated to the

United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people." Nullifiers believe that individual states declaring federal actions unconstitutional and then refusing to obey them is the better way to negate the power of an federal government which has grown far beyond the powers delegated by the constitution.

        Nullification may well be a valid way to reject the overreaches of the government. It was explicitly endorsed in writings by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison and many others, but it is the better way? If states were to start nullifying all the legislation they were opposed to it would lead to chaos. OJ may have been a free man after the trial, but his aquittal left a trail of bad feelings across the country.

        The Article 5 movement, however, is a well defined path clearly laid out in the Constitution. It is easy to understand with a straightforward path of execution. Carefully selected, pre-determined amendments to be considered, such as spending not exceeding revenues, and term limits to prevent career millionaire politicians should be acceptable to all, regardless of party.            -JG-

Click here to receive notices when Article 5 News is updated

Send comments, news and questions to: John@Articlel5News